Friday, February 3, 2012

You are here: Home > Sage Advice > How Big Is 1 Pound Of Muscle?

How Big Is 1 Pound Of Muscle?

by John Barban

If you browse the fitness – and specifically – muscle building media, you’ll always see headlines referring to the amount of ‘muscle’ you can gain.

This muscle gain is usually measured by the pound… as in “Gain 10 pounds of muscle” etc…

That’s all well and good, but what does a pound of muscle even look like? The picture above is approx 1 pound of muscle (in the form of a t-bone steak)

And if your goal is to gain weight, where exactly do you want that weight to be?

The muscle mass on your body is almost perfectly balanced between your upper body and your lower body, 52% in your legs and 48% in your upper body.

So if you wanted to gain muscle and specifically see an increase in bodyweight, you would need to do at least as much leg training as upper body training…but seriously…

… who wants to do that?

I’m not saying that you should neglect leg training, far from it. But what I am saying is that most guys have an image in their head of what they want to look like, and they always think it equals more muscle than is really needed.

Putting on 10 pounds of muscle is going to require at least 5 of it to be in your legs.

Putting on 20 pounds is going to require at least 10 of it to be in your legs.

But in your minds eye, I’ll bet all the changes you are hoping to see are mostly upper body changes such as bigger shoulders and chest, thicker wider back and kick ass arms.

The point is that big time changes in your upper body don’t require you to put on that much muscle to see dramatic effects.

A few pounds properly added to the right spots will make ALL the difference in the world.

Again, the picture attached to this post is 1 pound of steak (which is basically the same type of muscle that makes up your body)

That one pound is pretty damn big.

Next time you’re at the grocery store go over to the butcher’s counter and ask to see 2-3 even 5 pounds of steak/meat. It’s big! Now imagine slapping that much mass to your body and realize that a few pounds in the right places is all it takes to make a big time change in your look and shape.

There is simply no need to be chasing some lofty goal of gaining massive amounts of muscle, because:

A) its not possible without drugs

B) its not necessary to look great

C) Even if you do gain lots of weight half of it will have to be in your legs anyway.

Bottom line: Don’t worry about how much you weigh on the scale, but rather what your proportions look like in the mirror.

John

P.S. Of course this is exactly why I built the Adonis Index Workout

Tweet This Post

{ 6 comments }

Omar

Great post John.

Wazzup

half of it HAS to be in your legs ? … but what about all those Johnny Bravo’s out there (all upper body – tiny legs)

John Barban

Wazzup,

My point is that if you’re concerned about being ‘heavier’ then the only way to do that is equal gains in your legs and upper body. Sure you can just train upper body, but that won’t make you as heavy as if you also trained your legs.

You will eventually hit an upper limit of body weight you can force just by training upper body. For example lets say you can only put 10 total pounds of extra muscle on your upper body (without drugs)…then there is no way to get heavier unless you start training legs…

So when I say half of it HAS to be in your legs, I am talking about achieving your heaviest bodyweight through muscle gain.

I am not making any reference to the shape or proportion of your body, just weight.

Make sense now?

JB

Gabby

I have to agree. If you aren’t proportioned right, it’s not worth it. I’ve seen some people who are all about gaining more and more and more weight, that they end up not noticing they look silly with huge arms/small legs or the other way around. Its all about spreading it about.

Andy

I guess I’m the weird guy who cannot picture results without seeing fantastic leg development as well (by fantastic, I mean for a drug free individual who has no desire to put on speedos and oil and stand around with a bunch of other guys in speedos and oil LOL). Perhaps it’s a background which includes powerlifting and olympic lifting, but when I think of results I think of powerful lean quads, big rounded hamstrings, and spinal erectors which look like railroad ties LOL…

Jon

Yeah i agree with this… I only work out my upper body, (just started a few months ago) but i can now bench 170…. but however i can leg bench 480 pounds… and I don’t work out my legs
Don’t forget that any pounds you put on on your upper body wethir its fat or muscle
your legs have to still support the weight.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: